Does restricted stock circumvent 409A requirements?
Answers
Restricted stock gets around the most obvious feature of IRC 409A -- the 20% federal surtax imposed on option recipients who are granted options priced below the fair market value of common stock (in California this effectively is doubled because the Franchise
However, a restricted stock grant is taxable to the recipient at the time of grant -- and the taxable amount is the fair market value of the common stock granted. The one benefit of the structure is that taxation takes into account the vesting schedule of the restriction.
Can you clarify your question? In what sense are you using "409A requirements"? 409A regulates both deferred compensation and stock valuation.
If you're asking about 409A in the context of deferred compensation, then the answer is that all equity compensation awards must be either compliant with or exempt from 409A. This applies to both public and privately held companies.
If you're asking about 409A in the context of stock valuation, then the answer is sort of yes and no. This portion of 409A only applies to privately held companies. Restricted stock is a full-value award meaning that for
Just wanted to make a few clarifications:
1. Restricted Stock AWARDS are exempt from 409A (just like stock options granted at the money), but in terms of expensing them, as Achaessa points out, you do still generally WANT a 409A valuation in order to determine a "correct" fair value
2. Restricted Stock UNITS are NOT exempt and you do need to be very careful to comply with the regs to avoid triggering the punitive tax impact to your participants (20% at vest +, as mentioned above)
3. To clarify what Jim said, above, Restricted Stock Awards are only taxable at grant in the US if you file an 83(b) election, accelerating the tax liabilty to grant. Otherwise they are taxable when there is no longer "substantial