Or put another way, what often doesn't get the attention it deserves in a due diligence checklist?
What typically gets overlooked on a business acquisition due diligence checklist?
Answers
Proformative has this free
"Acquisition Due Diligence Checklist"
www.proformative.com/whitepapers/acquisition-due-diligence-checklist
As well as this free
https://www.proformative.com/whitepapers/financial-due-diligence-kicking-tires-your-potential-acquisition
Enjoy!
Best... Sarah
The effect of add-backs on the business and what growth factor it could have played if it weren't an add-back.
The piece that is often overlooked or mis-judged relates to the expense of integrating the
Social issues are toughest. Keep an eye on who will or will not get along, realizing that your own staff may be working to torpedo success in the deal.
Also watch for state and local
After having managed many, many acquisitions, what I find missing time and again on a due diligence checklist is the human factor. It's never on a checklist, but it's the most important factor in acquiring a company (assuming that it's not just, e.g.,
I fully agree with the point on people. Also often underestimated are the costs of completing litigation/defense that is not indemnified and systems integration.
We took over another store once and didn't feel like any of the existing staff would be a good fit into our culture so we let them all go immediately. In retrospect that probably was a bad move. We scrambled for months trying to build a completely new team. All it did was cost us resources we really didn't have. If I had the choice again, I would retain at least the ones that may be salvageable; work really close with them while adding new associates to the mix. If they just can't make the transition at least we can say we gave it effort and didn't leave the store so short staffed we probably lost more business in the long run. What I am trying to say is I agree - People and cultural fit would definitely be the most impacting issues I have witnessed.
Building on Christie's note, I would add this: depending on what type of acquisition it is, look for signs that your organization (the buyer) staff does not assume that the acquired's staff are automatically inferior to them (whether in skills or reporting lines in your post-integration org chart). I've seen people adopt that superior attitude for no reason other than politics, and create a mess as a result.