Should I reconnect with VCs that passed on our business model prior to a successful pivot?
Answers
It is always a good idea to keep in touch with potential investors, if your core business idea/
I would suggest you try. Its easier to contact someone you know than someone you dont. They can only say no a second time!
First, I agree with Kent and Simon. Second, pivot or not, keep in mind there are what I call a hard pass and a soft pass. A hard pass would be, we will not invest in this type of solution, market, etc. A soft pass can be "come back when you have more traction", "we've had a bad experience with a similar company", "a Partner or two didn't buy in", etc. With soft passes 1) keep sending brief frequent updates and 2) if you qualify that it is worth your time and effort, ask for an immediate rerun and see if you can turn them around. Pass doesn't always mean pass. Working with one of my companies after a pass from a billion dollar plus fund, we got a rerun with that VC and less than a month after the pass we had a good term sheet that we accepted for $6M+ on a $7M+ round.
I think Michael's point is valid. You have nothing to gain by going back to a VC that does not participate in your market or who rejected your technology solution. You also must consider if the investor did not believe in the
I suggest asking yourself precisely what elements of your business model you pivoted on and what evidence you've gained that your business model now works and is scalable. Startups often seek funding for what is no more than a solution without context of the customer pain it solves or a repeatable sales process for reaching target customers. If you have a meaningful sample size of customers and more than 40% are telling you the solution is a must-have, you may well have something VCs will consider worth a second look. Michael's point is critical also; be sure you are in their space. Some renewed research to understand investment strategy and the types of companies each invests in will go a long ways.
Good luck!
To carry on the thread from Michael and Peter, it will help make your case if you present data showing your customer interviews and how their feedback helped you make the pivot. Customer discovery interviews demonstrate a true market need. If you can then present data on how customers reacted to your post-pivot solution, that builds the basis by which you can argue that the VC should reconsider your firm. Better if you can document some preliminary customer orders for your solution. Best if you can get some initial deposits for the orders.
Raising money and developing relationships with VCs is part of an ongoing
Unless you've met this criteria, I wouldn't waste the VC firm's time and most importantly your time. Move on, as your recent successes based upon the successful pivot may be worth more to a new VC firm. Good luck!
It is absolutley worth your time to revisit VCs that have passed on the opportunity in the past, provided they have a history of focus on investments in your space. Many times VCs pass on teams that they do not know well. If your's has successfully orchestrated a pivot due to a better market opportunity, that provides some insight into the ability of the team. VCs typically watch lesser known companies from a distant to see how they conduct themselves, especially when boot strapped, and are usually open to revisiting. Make sure to address the pivot, the strategy behind it and what material milestones you are realizing that were identified when it was decided to change. VCs are interested in one thing, better than market returns. If you can articulate a pathway for this, they are interested in talking regardless of a previous no (assuming it isn't a fatal people issue).